Unblurring the Lines Between Cyber, Technology and IP Risk in the Canadian Public Sector

Digital infrastructure now underpins nearly every public service in Canada. From municipal operations to healthcare systems and classroom learning environments, public organizations rely on a complex web of interconnected technologies. When these systems fail, the impact is immediate and very public. A single incident involving a third-party technology provider can quickly cascade across multiple municipalities, school divisions, healthcare organizations and government agencies. What was once a localized technology problem can now become a multi-organizational disruption in a matter of minutes. The consequences are significant.

Public entities may face:

• Service disruption and operational shutdowns
• Data exposure and privacy investigations
• Reputational damage and heightened public scrutiny
• Substantial financial and recovery costs

These outcomes highlight something that is increasingly true across the sector: public entities are no longer simply service providers. they are technology operators.

Public Entities Are Now Technology Operators

The modern public sector operates digital ecosystems as complex as many private enterprises. This includes managing software, supporting integrated platforms and maintaining data environments shared across agencies, partners and vendors. For many organizations, this ecosystem includes:

• Online tax, utility and permitting platforms
• Student information and learning management systems
• Patient and client service tools
• Custom built applications, shared data platforms and digital publications

These tools create clear operational benefits, but they also reshape the organization’s risk profile. When systems fail or digital services are interrupted, the resulting loss rarely falls neatly within one insurance policy. A single event may trigger:

• Cyber liability
• Technology and professional liability
• Business interruption
• Media and intellectual property exposures

Traditional public sector coverage structures were not designed for this level of interconnectedness. The result is a growing need to understand how these risks overlap, and where gaps may exist.

A Growing and Often Overlooked Exposure

Threat actors are increasingly targeting technology supply chains. Instead of attacking individual organizations, they focus on the software and services that support many. A single compromise can ripple across dozens of public entities at the same time. Meanwhile, public organizations are generating and storing more intangible assets than ever before. Proprietary data, internally developed applications, original digital content and unique workflow tools all carry intellectual property considerations.

These exposures are often under-addressed in standard municipal, education, healthcare and public agency insurance programs. Coverage gaps most often appear where cyber, professional services and intellectual property risks intersect, the space where public sector digitization is expanding fastest.

Contract and Vendor Risk Blind Spots

As public entities expand their digital capabilities, they increasingly rely on third-party firms for hosting, software development, system integration and ongoing technical support. The convenience and expertise these vendors provide is clear but the contractual structure around these relationships often creates hidden exposures. Several issues are worth considering:

1. Indemnity and limitation of liability clauses often shift risk back onto the public entity
   • Many technology vendors include clauses that cap their financial responsibility, regardless of the impact of a failure. In practice, this means a municipal or education customer may bear the majority of loss even if the root cause sits with the vendor.
2. Cyber insurance does not automatically close contractual gaps
   • Even if a cyber event originates with a third-party, insurer response depends on the policy wording. Losses arising from contractual obligations, service level failures or vendor performance issues may sit outside coverage.
3. Performance standards, security controls and response timelines must be embedded contractually
   • Clear expectations around uptime, patching cadence, breach notification timelines and data handling can materially reduce exposure, but they must be contractual, not assumed.
4. Vendor insolvency during a cyber event is an emerging and material risk
   • Some technology service providers lack the resources to survive major incidents. If a vendor collapses mid-event, public entities can be left with unsupported systems, limited access to data and no recourse.

When critical services depend on vendors, assumptions become liabilities. Contracts that were once administrative formalities now shape the outcome of crisis response, financial recovery and public trust. If vendor risk isn’t being scrutinized with the same rigor as internal cyber posture, the exposure isn’t just theoretical, it’s already embedded in daily operations. The time to tighten contracts, clarify obligations and reinforce insurance alignment is now, before a vendor becomes the weakest link in a very public incident.

Questions Worth Asking

As public sector operations become more interconnected and technology-dependent, gaps often appear in areas that decision makers assume are already covered. A few strategic questions can quickly reveal whether policies, contracts and responsibilities are aligned or whether silent exposure is building beneath the surface.

• Do our cyber and professional liability policies clearly respond to the same event?
• Is intellectual property exposure addressed if we develop or share digital tools?
• Are we protected if a third-party technology failure interrupts our services?
• Who leads and coordinates response when multiple policies are involved?

If these answers are not clear, the risk may already be present.

Public Sector Risk Has Evolved & Insurance Strategies Should Evolve Alongside It

Now is the time for municipalities, nonprofits, school divisions, healthcare organizations and public agencies to revisit how cyber, technology and intellectual property exposures connect within their insurance programs.

Clarity before an incident is far more valuable than certainty after one. If professional liability or emerging technology risks are on your radar, reach out to our team today to start the conversation.

Barrie Latter

Lead Consultant, Sales, Public Sector+

I’m Barrie Latter, Lead Consultant for Public Sector + at Axis Insurance. I bring over 15 years of insurance and risk management experience, with a career focused on supporting municipalities and public sector organizations across Canada.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY